A SIGNALS-Based Way to Think About Acquisition Targets

Most first-time buyers evaluate businesses opportunistically. They review what is listed, analyze the financials presented, and decide whether the numbers appear to work. This approach is reactive by design. It limits decision-making to what sellers choose to surface and when they choose to surface it.

A more durable approach is to step back from individual listings and ask what characteristics tend to make ownership more resilient over time. The SIGNALS framework, popularized by Codie Sanchez, offers one way to think about this question by highlighting structural features that often precede durable cash flow.

This is not a checklist. Few businesses exhibit every favorable signal. The value lies in understanding which signals are present, which are missing, and what that implies for risk, financing, and operator fit.

Speed relative to the industry

Growth, on its own, is not a signal. Relative growth is.

A business growing modestly in absolute terms may still be outperforming its industry baseline. Conversely, a fast-growing business may simply be riding a temporary wave that lifts all competitors equally.

The useful question is whether the business is expanding faster than similar businesses operating under the same conditions. Relative outperformance often indicates something structural, such as superior positioning, operational efficiency, pricing power, or customer retention.

What matters is whether the growth can persist without extraordinary effort from the owner. Growth that depends on unsustainable hours, underpricing, or one-time contracts is fragile. Growth that persists through normal operating behavior is more likely to transfer.

Industry-level survival characteristics

Not all industries carry the same baseline risk. Aggregate Canadian data consistently shows wide differences in business survival rates across sectors, even before operator skill is considered.

Some industries experience frequent churn because margins are thin, capital requirements are high, or customer behavior is volatile. Others persist because demand is recurring, contracts are sticky, or services are essential.

Industry selection does not remove risk, but it determines how much risk an owner must absorb personally. When an industry’s long-term survival rate is low, a buyer must understand what makes a specific business an exception and whether that exception is durable after ownership changes.

Generational ownership dynamics

A significant share of Canadian small businesses are owned by individuals approaching retirement age. Research from the Business Development Bank of Canada shows that many of these owners plan to exit within the next decade, and a large portion do not have formal succession plans in place.

This creates uneven supply and demand across sectors. In industries that require hands-on operation and offer limited prestige, the buyer pool is often thinner. In these cases, valuation pressure is shaped less by financial optimization and more by timing, continuity, and trust.

These dynamics do not guarantee favorable pricing. They do, however, influence how transactions are structured and why private, relationship-based discussions often precede formal listings.

Needs-based demand

Some businesses exist because customers want them. Others exist because customers need them.

Services tied to maintenance, compliance, safety, or basic functioning tend to persist through economic cycles. While revenue may fluctuate, demand rarely disappears entirely. This durability matters for both risk tolerance and financing, particularly when acquisition debt is involved.

A business whose revenue depends on discretionary spending must be evaluated differently from one that supports essential activity. The distinction shapes cash flow reliability, lender appetite, and owner stress during downturns.

Customer profile and price sensitivity

Who the business serves matters as much as what it sells.

Businesses serving affluent customers or well-capitalized commercial clients often face less price sensitivity and more predictable payment behavior. The cost to deliver the service may be similar, but margins and collection risk differ materially.

This applies to both consumer-facing and business-to-business models. Higher-quality customers do not eliminate operational challenges, but they change how pressure shows up when conditions tighten.

Ability to support leverage

Most acquisitions depend on some form of financing. A business that can support debt comfortably is structurally different from one that cannot, even if their revenues appear similar.

Clean financials, predictable cash flow, and reasonable margins determine whether institutional financing is available. Without leverage, buyers are constrained to cash purchases or highly customized seller arrangements, which narrows the universe of feasible opportunities.

This signal is less about maximizing debt and more about optionality. Businesses that qualify for financing give buyers more structural flexibility.

Systems beyond the owner

Finally, ownership transfer depends on whether the business can function without constant owner involvement.

Documented processes, trained staff, and repeatable operations reduce transition risk. When knowledge, pricing, or customer relationships live entirely in one person’s head, continuity becomes uncertain.

Most small businesses fall somewhere in between. The signal is not perfection, but direction. Businesses that already operate through systems tend to absorb ownership changes more smoothly than those built entirely on personal effort.

Using signals as probability, not promise

The SIGNALS framework does not identify guaranteed winners. It clarifies where structural forces are supportive and where execution must do more work.

Businesses that exhibit several favorable signals tend to offer more margin for error. Those that exhibit fewer can still succeed, but the burden shifts toward the buyer’s skill, stamina, and tolerance for complexity.

Ownership outcomes are shaped less by finding the perfect deal and more by understanding what kind of difficulty you are choosing to accept.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may also like these